![\"\"](\"https:\/\/proudparenting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/WASH21617.jpg\")
\nThe Washington Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a florist who refused to provide services for a same-sex wedding broke the state’s antidiscrimination law, even though she claimed doing so would violate her religious beliefs.<\/p>\n
\nThe Washington Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a florist who refused to provide services for a same-sex wedding broke the state’s antidiscrimination law, even though she claimed doing so would violate her religious beliefs.<\/p>\n
A lower court had fined Barronelle Stutzman, a florist in Richland, Washington, for denying service to a gay couple in 2013, and ordered her to pay a $1,000 fine.<\/p>\n
Stutzman argued that she was exercising her First Amendment rights. But the court held that her floral arrangements do not constitute protected free speech, and that providing flowers to a same-sex wedding would not serve as an endorsement of same-sex marriage.<\/p>\n
It’s one of several lawsuits around the country \u2014 including some involving bakers \u2014 about whether businesses can refuse to provide services over causes they disagree with, or whether they must serve everyone equally.<\/p>\n
A Colorado case involving a baker who would not make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, according to Lambda Legal. In 2014, the court declined to hear an appeal of a case out of New Mexico that went against a photographer who denied a same-sex couple service.<\/p>\n